Wikipedia Bias смотреть последние обновления за сегодня на Zoltanpub Jakarta.
I love Wikipedia! I even donated to it. But I won't donate again, now that I've learned how BIASED Wikipedia has become. ———— To make sure you see the new weekly video from Stossel TV, sign up here: 🤍 ———— No right-leaning outlets, Fox News Politics, the Daily Wire, the Daily Caller, etc… is considered “reliable” by Wikipedia. None. But even some of the most extreme leftist outlets get a "reliable" badge like “Jacobin," a self-described SOCIALIST outlet. Vox, Buzzfeed News, and Slate are also deemed “reliable” by Wikipedia. Editors may base stories on their reporting. Why did Wikipedia become so biased? Veteran Wikipedian Jonathan Weiss tells me that the site, like academia, has been captured by leftists. Some Wikipedia administrators even brag on their profiles, "this user is a socialist." Another put up images idolizing communist murderers Che Guevara and Vladimir Lenin. These administrators make final decisions about what counts as “reliable," and what goes on Wikipedia. That’s why for years, Wiki's "communism" page made NO mention of the millions killed by that ideology. US border facilities are listed under "concentration camps,” on the same page as Wikipedia’s holocaust facilities. Can we fix this? Wikipedia is supposed to be a site that "anyone can edit," so I made an edit. You can find out what happened in the video above.
Is Wikipedia a reliable source, or is it as prone to bias and false information as any other media outlet? In this video, we explore the fundamental problems of modern Wikipedia, and discover how the website regularly lies to its readers. One of the most basic lies Wikipedia tells is that it has a neutrality policy - in reality, the policy has glaring flaws. It's frequently used to assert liberal left worldviews as fact, as if they were the neutral statements of truth. On issues including (but not limited to) race and crime, drug legalization, and even religion, Wikipedia presents unbalanced and in some cases outright misleading information. The website has gotten to the point that its own co-founder, Larry Sanger, even wrote an article verbally destroying it. The article, titled 'Wikipedia Is Badly Biased' will be linked below. Other sources, including the many different studies documenting Wikipedia's left wing bias, are also linked. Follow me on other platforms! Telegram - 🤍 Bitchute - 🤍 Odysee - 🤍 Gab - 🤍 Citations: Wikipedia Is Badly Biased by Larry Sanger - 🤍 Do Experts or Collective Intelligence Write with More Bias? Evidence from Encyclopedia Britannica and Wikipedia - 🤍 Ideology and Composition Among an Online Crowd: Evidence from Wikipedians - 🤍 Wikipedia Source Analysis - 🤍 Differential rates of disciplinary action reveals evidence of political bias in Wikipedia's arbitration enforcement - 🤍 Music used in this video (in chronological order): Serenity - Prod. Riddiman Journey to Rome Part I - Jeff Van Dyck Autumn - Jeff Van Dyck Rome HQ - Jeff Van Dyck
Wikipedia is the #1 research tool in the world, boasting over 18 billion views per month. It also pushes a radical left-wing agenda. Crowder and crew expose how they do it. #Wikipedia #Bias #FactCheck Go to 🤍 and use promo code “Crowder15” to get 15% off your next order. Try the Walther! Visit 🤍 to shop online or use the dealer locator to find a Walther dealer near you! NEW MERCH! 🤍 GET TODAY'S SHOW NOTES with SOURCES: 🤍 Join MugClub to watch this show every day! 🤍 Subscribe to my podcast on iTunes: 🤍 FOLLOW ME: Website: 🤍 Twitter: 🤍 Instagram: 🤍 TikTok: 🤍 Snapchat: 🤍 Facebook: 🤍 Shoutout: 🤍 Music by 🤍Pogo
Freddie Sayers meets Larry Sanger. Listen to the podcast version: 🤍 Read the full article here: 🤍 Chances are, if you’ve ever been on the internet, you’ve visited Wikipedia. It is the world’s fifth largest website, pulling in an estimated 6.1 billion followers per month and serves as a cheat sheet for almost any topic in the world. So great is the online encyclopaedia’s influence is so great that it is the biggest and “most read reference work in history”, with as many as 56 million editions. But the truth about this supposedly neutral purveyor of information is a little more complex. Historically, Wikipedia has been written and monitored by a community of volunteers who collaborated and contested competing claims with one another. In the words of Wikipedia’s co-founder, Larry Sanger who spoke to Freddie Sayers on LockdownTV, these volunteers would “battle it out”. This battle of ideas on Wikipedia’s platform formed a crucial part of the encyclopaedia’s commitment to neutrality, which according to Sanger, was abandoned after 2009. In the years since, on issues ranging from Covid to Joe Biden, it has become increasingly partisan, primarily espousing an establishment viewpoint that increasingly represents "propaganda". This, says Sanger, is why he left the site in 2007, describing it as “broken beyond repair”. Follow UnHerd on social media: Twitter: 🤍 Facebook: 🤍 #wikipedia #covid19 #bias
"Clown World Journalism" is the best phrase I can think of to describe the difference between Wikileaks' scientific journalism and Wikipedia's obsession with secondary editorialized sources over hard facts. Wikipedia has a lot of problems, and the way that Wikileaks looks at journalism provides an interesting look into why Wikipedia has these problems. Biased sources, prejudiced editors, and a culture of complex gatekeeping have degenerated the once very usable site into being merely a mouthpiece for special interest establishment propaganda. LINKS All My Links: 🤍 If you want to leave me a tip / support my content: 🤍 Follow me on Twitter for channel updates and general bantz: 🤍 My Discord: 🤍 Odysee Backup: 🤍 Rumble Backup: 🤍 = Music: Stargate by HurricaneTurtle 🤍 Promoted by 🤍RoyaltyFreePlanet - 🤍 Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 🤍 SOURCEDUMP: Sites from the media mentioning Wikileaks: 🤍 🤍 🤍 🤍 🤍 🤍 🤍 🤍 Wikileaks on Gamergate: 🤍 Gamergate: The Monster to Silence 🤍 Wikileaks articles Referenced: 🤍 🤍 🤍 🤍 🤍 Wikipedia Bias: 🤍 🤍 🤍 🤍 Wikipedia used to be Good: 🤍 Co Founder Interview ( Full Video ): 🤍 Funny video on Steven Crowder not being allowed to post anything on Wikipedia: 🤍
Wikipedia is making us all dumb and lazy. SUBSCRIBE: 🤍 FOLLOW ME: 🇨🇦Support me on Patreon! 🤍 🤖Join my Discord! 🤍 🇺🇸Follow me on Instagram! 🤍 🇨🇦Read my latest Washington Post columns: 🤍 🇨🇦Visit my Canada Website 🤍 Some music by: Craig Henderson- 🤍 ComradeF- 🤍 HASHTAGS: #wikipedia #rant #videoessay
📖 Order my book, "The True Story of Fake News" from Amazon ➡️ here 🤍 (ad) ⚠️ Order your shirts here ➡️: 🤍 💲 Sponsor me on Patreon here ➡️ 🤍 Order my book "Hollywood Propaganda: How TV, Movies, and Music Shape Our Culture" from Amazon here: 🤍 or download the e-book from Kindle, iBooks, Google Play, or Nook. Order my book "The Liberal Media Industrial Complex" here: 🤍 (ad) Mark Dice is an independent media analyst and bestselling author of "Hollywood Propaganda: How TV, Movies, and Music Shape Our Culture.” He has a bachelor's degree in Communication from California State University and was the first conservative YouTuber to reach 1 million subscribers (in 2017). He has been featured on Fox News, the History Channel, E! Entertainment, the Drudge Report, and news outlets around the world. This video description and the pinned comment contains Amazon and/or other affiliate links, which means if you click them and purchase the product(s), Mark will receive a small commission. Copyright © 2021 by Mark Dice. All Rights Reserved.
This video is about Wikipedia Editors Patreon: patreon.com/ghostgum Twitter: twitter.com/notghostgum Shoutout to Squiff for the Art: 🤍 Outro Song: I'm just chillin - Seggito #wikipedia #mods
Please leave a like, comment and/or subscribe if you want to support the channel! Also follow me on: 🤍 🤍 Buy me a coffee on: 🤍 Citations: Human rights in the Soviet Union - Wikipedia Response to the Death of Robert Conquest (montclair.edu)
In 2015 an anonymous user reported that one of Wikipedia’s oldest administrators...had been posting tens of thousands of pages on...Milkers. This is their story Neelix and the Wikipedia Scandal If you want MORE videos with better quality....Give your Support on Patreon! Patreon - 🤍 If you enjoyed the video message me on Twitter! Twitter- 🤍 If you liked what you saw, donate here! Donate via Venmo- 🤍 Have an idea? Want to do some business things together? Email me. email- vincevintageYT🤍gmail.com SOURCES Redirects deleted list IN FULL 🤍 Reddit recap of the trial 🤍 Thank you to Barely Sociable/Slightly Sociable/Barely Musical for the idea
Help Support Weight Loss With This Secret Powder I Use ➡️ 🤍 ⬅️ Get FREE express delivery! Click Here ^^^^ ———————————————————————— ★★★ THE POPULIST REVOLT HAS JUST BEGUN ★★★ The co-founder of Wikipedia is SLAMMING the site for its Left-wing Bias, and this co-founder is doing something about it: He’s LAUNCHING His Own Alternative Free-Speech Site! In this video, we’re going to take a look at the ridiculously leftist bias that pervades Wikipedia, how the co-founder is actively launching a free-speech alternative, and how his launch is part of a larger world of parallel structures that promise a future free from the ridiculous cancel culture tyranny of the modern left! You are NOT going to want to miss this! ———————————————————————— ►FIGHT BACK AGAINST BIG TECH CENSORSHIP! SUBSCRIBE to my Brand-New RUMBLE Channel here: 🤍 ———————————————————————— ►PARLER IS BACK! Click Here to Subscribe to our NEW Parler feed: 🤍 ———————————————————————— ✅ LIMITED TIME OFFER! Get Your Copy of My Book RETURN OF CHRISTENDOM at a 50% DISCOUNT Here ➡️🤍 ———————————————————————— ►Help us REACH #1 with our NEW PODCAST PROGRAM! Download your podcasts here 🤍 ———————————————————————— ►Brought to you by Liberty Water: Working to quench the thirst of freedom-loving Americans. Get your water today at 🤍 ———————————————————————— ❤ WELCOME, EVERYONE!!! ❤ It's WONDERFUL to have you HERE! I post two videos a day analyzing current events in light of conservative trends so you can live in the present in light of even better things to come! ⚑ SHARE AND SUBSCRIBE TO MY CHANNEL ⚑ 🤍 ———————————————————————— ►BECOME A TURLEY TALKS INSIDERS CLUB MEMBER: 🤍 ►FIGHT BACK AGAINST BIG TECH CENSORSHIP! Sign-up here to discover Dr. Steve’s different social media options …. but without the censorship! 🤍 ►Download your own ‘Fake News Antidote’ Ebook here: 🤍 ✉ LET'S KEEP IN TOUCH! ✉ Make sure to sign-up for our ✉ TURLEY TALKS Email NEWSLETTER ✉ here: 🤍 ►FIGHT BACK AGAINST BIG TECH CENSORSHIP! Subscribe to my GAB PLATFORM: 🤍 ►Subscribe to my Brand-New RUMBLE Channel here: 🤍 ►Find me on BITCHUTE: 🤍
Wikipedia is big cringe. There are systematic reasons why it is the way it is, but I mean also some articles just make you think they must've been written by furries or something... I don't use it at all anymore, removed it from my bookmarks and don't plan on using it ever again. DONATE NOW: 🤍 💰😎👌💯 WEBSITE: 🤍 🌐❓🔎 Here's the boomer blogpost I mentioned by Larry Sanger co-founder and long-time critic of Wikipedia: 🤍
Tim, Ian, and Lydia join Larry Sanger, the former co-founder of Wikipedia, to discuss what's gone wrong with the platform. Sign Up For Exclusive Episodes At 🤍 Guest: Larry Sanger 🤍LSanger (Twitter) Merch - 🤍 Hosts: Tim 🤍Timcast (everywhere) Ian 🤍IanCrossland (everywhere) Lydia 🤍SourPatchLyds (Twitter, Minds), 🤍RealSourPatchLyds (Gab, Instagram) Podcast available on iTunes and Spotify, coming soon to all podcast platforms!
Wikipedia now boasts more than 5.7 million articles in English and millions more translated into other languages, all written by online volunteers. Errol Barnett talks to one editor who was named among Time Magazine’s most influential people on the internet. Watch "CBS This Morning" HERE: 🤍 Download the CBS News app on iOS HERE: 🤍 Download the CBS News app on Android HERE: 🤍 Like "CBS This Morning" on Facebook HERE: 🤍 Follow "CBS This Morning" on Twitter HERE: 🤍 Follow "CBS This Morning" on Instagram HERE: 🤍 Get new episodes of shows you love across devices the next day, stream local news live, and watch full seasons of CBS fan favorites anytime, anywhere with CBS All Access. Try it free! 🤍 Delivered by Norah O’Donnell, Gayle King, John Dickerson, and Bianna Golodryga, "CBS This Morning" offers a thoughtful, substantive and insightful source of news and information to a daily audience of 3 million viewers. The Emmy Award-winning broadcast presents a mix of daily news, coverage of developing stories of national and global significance, and interviews with leading figures in politics, business and entertainment. Check local listings for "CBS This Morning" broadcast times.
#AskAbhijit Episode 20, Question 21 WATCH FULL EPISODE: #AskAbhijit 20: Indian History | Abhijit Chavda ► 🤍 SUBSCRIBE ► 🤍 SHORT CLIPS CHANNEL ► 🤍 SUPPORT THE CHANNEL ►UPI (G-Pay/PhonePe/Paytm): abhijitchavda🤍icici ►PayPal: 🤍 ►Become A Member on YouTube: 🤍 JOIN #AbhijitChavda ★Discord: 🤍 ★Twitter: 🤍 ★Instagram: 🤍 ★Facebook: 🤍 ★Website: 🤍 ★Email Inquiries: inquiries.chavda🤍gmail.com #AskAbhijitPodcast ★Spotify: 🤍 ★Apple Podcasts: 🤍 ★Google Podcasts: 🤍 #AskAbhijitChavda #Abhijit #Chavda #AskAbhijitShow
To edit Wikipedia, you have to take a quiz on "neutrality." Is it really neutral? Crowder takes the quiz to find out! Taken from the full Wikipedia EXPOSED Special: 🤍 Shop the official LWC store: 🤍 Want to watch the full show every day? Join MugClub! 🤍 Use promo codes "student" "veteran" "military" to get daily access for $69/year! Follow me on Twitter: 🤍 Like me on Facebook: 🤍 Find behind the scenes footage on instagram: 🤍 "Eat My Butt"
Presentation from the Research track during Wiki Workshop 2023. See here for more information on authors and their papers: 🤍
Heartland Institute President Tim Huelskamp discusses Wikipedia bias.
Understanding the difference between bias and agenda can help us make better decisions about what information to trust. Visit 🤍 for more information and resources.
Wikipedia has a page on just about everything — but can it be used as a reliable source? Teen Fact-Checker Pride explains the different ways you can make sure a Wikipedia article is legit, along with tips on how you can make sure you're using the website responsibly. ATTENTION TEACHERS: This fact-check is featured in a free, one-hour lesson plan. The lesson is available through PBS LearningMedia, and includes lesson summary and a handout, among other resources. Go to: 🤍 - Learn more about MediaWise: 🤍 Follow MediaWise on Instagram: 🤍 Follow MediaWise on Facebook: 🤍 Follow MediaWise on Twitter: 🤍 Follow MediaWise on TikTok: 🤍
Watch the full episode here: 🤍 The Sitch and Adam Show ... YouTubers PSA Sitch and Adam Friended host this weekly Sunday show. It happens on some different channels but this playlist has every episode. Enjoy. 🤍 Pre-Orders for our comic are live NOW! Supervillains Anonymous (Graphic Novel): In a future perfect world where hunger and disease have been completely eliminated a rebel band of supervillains struggles to return the world to its more dangerous and magnificent days. Story by Sitch & Adam. Illustrated by Adam & CT. 🤍 Support the podcast on Subscribestar: 🤍 Send me a donation if you like what I do! 🤍
Tucker Carlson and Wikipedia co-founder discuss how the website has become more biased #FoxNews #Tucker Subscribe to Fox News! 🤍 Watch more Fox News Video: 🤍 Watch Fox News Channel Live: 🤍 FOX News Channel (FNC) is a 24-hour all-encompassing news service delivering breaking news as well as political and business news. The number one network in cable, FNC has been the most-watched television news channel for 18 consecutive years. According to a 2020 Brand Keys Consumer Loyalty Engagement Index report, FOX News is the top brand in the country for morning and evening news coverage. A 2019 Suffolk University poll named FOX News as the most trusted source for television news or commentary, while a 2019 Brand Keys Emotion Engagement Analysis survey found that FOX News was the most trusted cable news brand. A 2017 Gallup/Knight Foundation survey also found that among Americans who could name an objective news source, FOX News was the top-cited outlet. Owned by FOX Corporation, FNC is available in nearly 90 million homes and dominates the cable news landscape, routinely notching the top ten programs in the genre. Watch full episodes of your favorite shows The Five: 🤍 Special Report with Bret Baier: 🤍 Fox News Primetime: 🤍 Tucker Carlson Tonight: 🤍 Hannity: 🤍 The Ingraham Angle: 🤍 Fox News 🤍 Night: 🤍 Follow Fox News on Facebook: 🤍 Follow Fox News on Twitter: 🤍 Follow Fox News on Instagram: 🤍
Russia fined Wikipedia for spreading misinformation and propaganda on the Ukraine war. But this isn't the 1st time it has been called out for being biased. In India, Wikipedia states, “The Delhi Riots…[were] caused CHIEFLY by Hindu mobs attacking Muslims.”
Vanessa Otero set out to rank an ever-growing partisan media landscape, with the belief that an informed public is a better public. Learn more about this story at 🤍 Find more videos like this at 🤍 Follow Newsy on Facebook: 🤍 Follow Newsy on Twitter: 🤍
a brief look at wikipedia shows some bias
For years, Wikipedia - the world's largest online encyclopaedia - has ranked among the top visited websites in the world. It is likely the first result to pop up on an internet search. And since 2001, the "Free Encyclopaedia" has become a key source for online discovery and research. But more than 80% of Wikipedia's volunteer editors are male, and the gender imbalance is reflected in its articles, say Wikipedians working to address the site's gender bias and lack of inclusivity. Over the years, numerous efforts by the Wikimedia Foundation and others have been made to encourage more articles and citations focused on highlighting the accomplishments of women. Wikipedia entries about women are less likely to be accepted and annotated by its online community of editors. A 2021 study found that 41% of Wikipedia biographies nominated for deletion were about women. That figure seems staggering given that only 19% of published Wikipedia biographies are about women, according to the Wikiproject Women in Red. In this episode of The Stream, we’ll look at some of the editing initiatives that are working to fight gender bias, one Wikipedia entry at a time. Join the conversation: TWITTER: 🤍 FACEBOOK: 🤍 Subscribe to our channel 🤍 #aljazeeraenglish #ajstream #wikipedia
In this video I cover some recent and major revisions that have recently been made to vs battle wiki and I uncover what I believe to be a both hypocritical and severe bias against the Naruto verse within VSB. My Discord- 🤍 My Twitter- 🤍 Surfbone's channel- 🤍 Link to KingBullet's Universal Naruto Video- 🤍 definitely go check out that one above after this video. Check out these video's below if you are interested in Naruto content. Link to my Kakuzu video- 🤍 Link to my Madara video- 🤍
The Peter Schiff Show Podcast - Episode 89a I forgot to mention this, but the Wikipedia page also has a section on my gold predictions that starts in 2012 with gold at $1,700. This is meant to make me look bad as gold is currently trading around $1,200. But there is no mention of the fact that when I first started recommending gold to my clients it was below $300. In fact, there are numerous videos on youtube that show me on CNBC recommending gold when it was still below $500, and numerous articles written by me online going back to 2004 when I forecast gold prices, which at that time we still below $400, would rise to $1,000 per ounce. But those accurate forecast would make me look good, so they are not included in Wikipedia 🤍
Jess Wade is a physicist who's going viral for making nearly 2,000 Wikipedia bios for female and minority scientists and engineers whose accomplishments are not documented.
→🤍 | Watch the full episode of The Ezra Levant Show (SUBSCRIBERS ONLY) Guest host David Menzies is joined by Rebel News contributor Ian Miles Cheong to discuss the #TwitterFiles and Elon Musk's assertion that Wikipedia has a 'non-trivial left-wing bias'. Visit Rebel News for more on this story → 🤍 Originally published by Rebel News for RebelNews+ subscribers. Learn more at 🤍
Wikipedia does not care about rational thinking. This video shows why this is, using the Cultural Marxism article as an example. LINKS All My Links: 🤍 If you want to leave me a tip / support my content: 🤍 Follow me on Twitter for channel updates and general bantz: 🤍 My Discord: 🤍 Odysee Backup: 🤍 Rumble Backup: 🤍 = Additional reading: 🤍 🤍
It's the go-to website for information on just about anything. But is the info on Wikipedia worth it's weight in megabytes? Trace has the answer and tells us about a new plan to up the accuracy of some of its most popular pages. Read More: UCSF First U.S. Medical School to Offer Credit For Wikipedia Articles 🤍 "UC San Francisco soon will be the first U.S. medical school at which medical students can earn academic credit for editing medical content on Wikipedia." Medical Students Can Now Earn Credit for Editing Wikipedia 🤍 "Starting this winter, medical students at the University of California San Francisco will be able to obtain academic credit from an unlikely source: Wikipedia." Using Wikipedia 🤍 "As a tool for scholarly research, Wikipedia can be either a grade-killer or a valuable friend, depending on who you ask and what you hope to accomplish using it. What is fairly certain is that your professor won't let you cite it in a scholarly research paper." Citing Wikipedia 🤍 Most university lecturers discourage students from citing any encyclopedia in academic work, preferring primary sources; some specifically prohibit Wikipedia citations. Wales stresses that encyclopedias of any type are not usually appropriate to use as citeable sources, and should not be relied upon as authoritative." Special Report Internet encyclopaedias go head to head 🤍 "Jimmy Wales' Wikipedia comes close to Britannica in terms of the accuracy of its science entries, a Nature investigation finds." Britannica attacks... and we respond. 🤍 Watch More: Are We All Internet Addicts? 🤍 Scientists Vs Internet Trolls 🤍 7 NEW Wonders Of the World: 🤍 DNews is dedicated to satisfying your curiosity and to bringing you mind-bending stories & perspectives you won't find anywhere else! New videos twice daily. Watch More DNews on TestTube 🤍 Subscribe now! 🤍 DNews on Twitter 🤍 Anthony Carboni on Twitter 🤍 Laci Green on Twitter 🤍 Trace Dominguez on Twitter 🤍 DNews on Facebook 🤍 DNews on Google+ 🤍 Discovery News 🤍
Access the prototype here 🤍 + info 🤍 The aim of this research project is to improve the exploration experience of underpriviledged communities in creative archives. At the moment we have created a web app that will help individuals to explore a topic of their choice in Wikipedia and provide information (a feedback) that will highlight the type of stereotypical biases (memory transgressions towards stereotypes such as gender, race, economic background etc.) that characterize each information.
Confirmation bias is a tendency to look for, interpret, and recall information in ways that affirm our preconception. Whenever we encounter objective facts on an issue we look at them through the lens of our own beliefs. As a result, we see and overrate where the two intercept. The bias is strongest for emotionally charged issues or when we search for desired outcomes. This joke illustrates it quite well... Subscribe to: 🤍 A special thank you to our patrons: Avigail, Badrah, Cedric Wang, David Markham, Denis Kraus, Don Bone, Esther Chiang, Eva Marie Koblin, John Zhang, Julien Dumesnil, Mathis Nu, and all the others!!! You keep us going! If you want to join us, visit 🤍 Read the entire script here: 🤍 SOURCES: 🤍 🤍 🤍 🤍 Classroom activity: 🤍 Subscribe to: 🤍
DONATE : 🤍 Help support the channel, it’s greatly appreciated! Is Wikipedia a neutral source of information. It's a mixed bag, but the short answer is no. We take a look at its socialism page as well as the pages for parler and gab. #wikipedia #socialism Website : 🤍radiobaloney.com Youtube : 🤍 Bitchute : 🤍 Odysee :🤍 Rumble. :🤍 Minds. : 🤍 Spreaker podcast : 🤍
Aiming to start at 3pm PST (Pacific) Saturday Dec 21th! Happy Solstice! Time for a livestream. Going to cover a few things today: - Astronomical and historical significance of xmas - a follow up to my last livestream looking at wikipedia bias as it relates to the younger dryas - reviewing raw footage from some sites you may not have seen before - Q&A, talking with chat! Hope to see you on the stream! If you can't make it live, It will available for viewing on my channel afterwards. UnchartedX: 🤍 Support my work: 🤍 Paypal tip jar: 🤍 Patreon: 🤍 SubscribeStar: 🤍 Bitcoin/crypto wallet send address: bc1qtg5kaq0s7434fsulm7w94zsqkww57ueel4f4ed Official UnchartedX Merch store! Support the channel, get some natty threads: 🤍 Contact me on: Twitter: 🤍 Instagram: 🤍 Email: info🤍unchartedx.com BitChute: 🤍
Let's talk about Wikipedia. Wikipedia is often maligned by teachers and twitter trolls alike as an unreliable source. And yes, it does sometimes have major errors and omissions, but Wikipedia is also the Internet's largest general reference work and as such an incredibly powerful tool. Today we'll discuss using Wikipedia for good - to help us get a birds-eye view of content, better evaluate information with lateral reading, and find trustworthy primary sources. Special thanks to our partners from MediaWise who helped create this series: The Poynter Institute The Stanford History Education Group (sheg.stanford.edu) Follow MediaWise and their fact-checking work across social: 🤍 🤍 🤍 🤍 MediaWise is supported by Google. Crash Course is on Patreon! You can support us directly by signing up at 🤍 Thanks to the following Patrons for their generous monthly contributions that help keep Crash Course free for everyone forever: Eric Prestemon, Sam Buck, Mark Brouwer, Naman Goel, Patrick Wiener II, Nathan Catchings, Efrain R. Pedroza, Brandon Westmoreland, dorsey, Indika Siriwardena, James Hughes, Kenneth F Penttinen, Trevin Beattie, Satya Ridhima Parvathaneni, Erika & Alexa Saur, Glenn Elliott, Justin Zingsheim, Jessica Wode, Kathrin Benoit, Tom Trval, Jason Saslow, Nathan Taylor, Brian Thomas Gossett, Khaled El Shalakany, SR Foxley, Yasenia Cruz, Eric Koslow, Caleb Weeks, Tim Curwick, D.A. Noe, Shawn Arnold, Malcolm Callis, Advait Shinde, William McGraw, Andrei Krishkevich, Rachel Bright, Jirat, Ian Dundore Want to find Crash Course elsewhere on the internet? Facebook - 🤍 Twitter - 🤍 Tumblr - 🤍 Support Crash Course on Patreon: 🤍 CC Kids: 🤍
Even with public trust at an all-time low, Wikipedia continues to maintain people's confidence. How do they do it? Former CEO of Wikimedia Foundation Katherine Maher delves into the transparent, adaptable and community-building ways the online encyclopedia brings free and reliable information to the public while also accounting for bias and difference of opinion. "The seeds of our disagreement can actually become the roots of our common purpose," she says. If you love watching TED Talks like this one, become a TED Member to support our mission of spreading ideas: 🤍 Follow TED! Twitter: 🤍 Instagram: 🤍 Facebook: 🤍 LinkedIn: 🤍 TikTok: 🤍 The TED Talks channel features talks, performances and original series from the world's leading thinkers and doers. Subscribe to our channel for videos on Technology, Entertainment and Design — plus science, business, global issues, the arts and more. Visit 🤍 to get our entire library of TED Talks, transcripts, translations, personalized talk recommendations and more. Watch more: 🤍 🤍 TED's videos may be used for non-commercial purposes under a Creative Commons License, Attribution–Non Commercial–No Derivatives (or the CC BY – NC – ND 4.0 International) and in accordance with our TED Talks Usage Policy (🤍 For more information on using TED for commercial purposes (e.g. employee learning, in a film or online course), please submit a Media Request at 🤍 #TED #TEDTalks
look at chad chad!!! 🤍 today (we're looking at) chad chad's new favorite website, conservapedia editing help by SuperChaoticToonz: 🤍 u can support me on patreon if u want! 🤍 -SOCIALS- super exclusive second channel: 🤍 not as exclusive twitter: 🤍 publicly owned twitch streams: 🤍 instagam: 🤍
Wikipedia is biased. Water is wet. Nothing new under the sun. Still, I want to present a particularly egregious example. Naomi Seibt is a talented Youtuber who graduate from College (actually the German equivalent 'Gymnasium') at only sixteen years of age. Whilst still in school she competed successfully in widely respected math and physics competitions, winning second and first place respectively. #Wikipedia, though, paints her differently, very differently, you know...Nazi. But, of course, this is not the used word. The innuendo game is well-known already. Random voices are quoted that accuse her of 'white nationalism' and 'antisemitism.' Outright lies are included. Her poem 'Sometimes I Keep Silent' were about 'nationalism' when the title already says what it is actually about: the silence. (The #poem can be found here: 🤍 Use an automated translation tool of your choice if you wish.) She was even inspired by Stefan Molyneux. - You mean the Canadian Youtuber? Thank you for asking. I'm not sure because on Naomi Seibt's Wikipedia entries, both the English and the German one, he is also a Nazi. She also "dismisses" the allegations that she were a "puppet" of the right wing. How dare you! The #Heartland Institute, where she worked, is described as pseudo-scientific. And the culprit behind our lack of scientific knowledge is also found: the old white man. The Silicon Valley bias, like the media bias, is much more intense against people who dare to talk about politics outside of the English-speaking world. Consequently, it is no surprise that even Richard Grenell, former US Ambassador to Germany, is accused of mingling with the "far right" (Grenell is homosexual.)